I happen to work to have "wrapped" grammatical doubts, fortunately, usually the solution is at hand: just see a couple of dictionaries.
But why are the questions of grammar? In reality
usually a "doubtful grammar" is a symptom of a change in lingustico file: a new form, a new spelling is emerging against the existing one.
This causes a temporary disconnect between the standard el `use, with the rule which obstinately supports the existence and` variant pushing to use the new one.
hard to peel off `until the new version ends, inevitably, to be accepted by the standard. The process can take several years and usually consist in affirmation of the new variant not only quantitatively but also qualitatively through an appearance of Use contexts more and more "high" until a new edition of a dictionary, containing additional ` perhaps marking it at the beginning as less acceptable variant. The standard `el
use made peace and doubt disappears.
Take the case of "marked" as meaning "all right". A search in dictionaries or on the infamous DOP not and can not be found on the Internet is defined as incorrect form of "right." But then Why do so many people think that we can write "bear"? Meanwhile
Why Why "purpose" is written in, and thus attacked is natural to think that you can do for "bear" is actually the norm can not explain why `" written "yes, but" attached "no visa that in both cases you start with a preposition more substantive. Not only that, the rule prohibits "bear" but accepts "appostissimo" (at least they do dictionary De Mauro and Zanichelli) as the superlative of "right."
course is a matter of time before "bear" is finally "official" recognition as a variant of "okay". In
both in the use "applied" appears to be in good health: Online I found a bit of certificates.
An exhibition entitled "Tutt'apposto?"
And you're affixed with proof costume?
I put my head but I do not remember where affixed
Pdl, Berlusconi: "all right, everything was perfect"
0 comments:
Post a Comment